“Who wants to give their mother-in-law a GLOCK?”
OR:
“Empty a couple of clips into the kids and they’ll learn to behave”
Evidently; “The National Review Online”, screens submissions critical of it’s, “Blog Row”, contributors’ ‘pensées’ rather carefully. At least, they have eschewed my submissions.
I tendered a comment on a posting by Andy McCarthy on Tuesday that NRO preferred not to append; but, I am not about to let the matter go unredressed. Mr. McCarthy’s piece purports to lend support for a policy that would increase US Military aggression and violence in
“I think it’s possible Americans could be persuaded that we must step it up and achieve an unambiguous military victory in
Mr. McCarthy's problem analysis and prescription is based upon Reuel Marc Gerecht's problem analysis and prescription [Wall Street Journal, April. 4/06] which in turn is predicated upon the Department of Defense’s problem analysis and prescription for the ‘disastrophe’ in Iraq. It must have taken some really deep thinking. Odds are, many NRO readers will feel enlightened by Andy’s piece; especially those who think, "hindsight", is the view you get when you have your head stuck up your own; really deep.
But there is a sizable contingency who prefer the view by daylight; those who, like Mrs. Lincoln, are still over-awed by images of a reality unlimned by the narrow and peculiar ‘focus’ of hacks writing critical reviews for the morrows entertainment columns.
The US Military has no business being in
Mr. McCarthy’s prescription is to give the witch more bullets and a mandate to wing the kids by way of trying to re-establish domestic harmony.
00Buck
The Boundary Bay Morning SteamerÓ
bbmornsteamer@dccnet.com
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home